Weapons of mass destruction

CARLOS LOBO, DANIEL GONZALEZ, ENGLISH IV

The countries that have most quantity weapons of mass destruction are thinking to control the world, because this kind of weapons has effect over the people, in other hand, “in United States, in 1996 a referendum was done, but in this case the referendum reflected the overwhelming consensus of the senate this possibility of domestic terrorism including chemical nuclear or biological weapons are a significant thread to United States national security.”( “Defending the United States against weapons of mass destruction”); the last note explains that not all the people are concern about have weapons of mass destruction, because they understand how the danger increases for themselves and all the countries Another negative consequence is the amount of money needed to build a weapon, this money must be taken of the national budget, for example, the United States by 2011 quoted 3.1 billion dollars for different activities of security with weapons of mass destruction Weapons of mass destruction have been created in order to protect or defend themselves from attacks enemies,(“Report Cites U.S. budget increase for WMD Security”, March 11, 2010) but more that are generating insecurity, fear and exaggerated spending money in building them, if we take this money to buy food or to solve environmental problems we could minimize world hunger and global warming.

Works Cited:
1. “Defending the United States against weapons of mass destruction” http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu
2. “Report Cites U.S. budget increase for WMD Security”, March 11, 2010 http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org